Verify every claim before you publish

Research & market intelligence · Marketing content & social · checked 2026-10-17

Have Claude list each factual claim in a draft, check web claims with Perplexity, research claims with Consensus and numbers with Wolfram, and mark anything unconfirmed before you publish.

Independent review. IonBin has no partnership with any tool on this page and was not paid for this page. Our evaluation is our own, based on public documentation and our research. Product names are trademarks of their owners and are used for identification only. How disclosure works.

Goal

Publish only what you can source.

Connects through: MCP

Steps

#WhoWhat happensHowStatus
1Claude Extracts every factual claim into a checklist AI platform Confirmed
2Perplexity Finds web sources for each claim through Perplexity’s remote MCP server
Billed to a Perplexity API organization.
MCP Confirmed · source ↗
3Consensus Finds research for scientific claims through the Consensus MCP server
Counts against your plan’s monthly API & MCP uses.
MCP Confirmed · source ↗
4Wolfram Recomputes figures through the Wolfram Cloud MCP server MCP Confirmed · source ↗
5You Cut or mark unconfirmed claims and approve the draft Human step Confirmed

Confirmed means the vendor documents it (linked). It doesn't mean IonBin has tested it. AI-platform and human steps need no source.

Human approval

You approve the final draft; unconfirmed claims are cut or marked.

Watch out for

Keep the human approval step: You approve the final draft; unconfirmed claims are cut or marked.

Starter prompt

Goal: Publish only what you can source. Tools involved: Claude, Perplexity, Consensus, Wolfram. Your part: extracts every factual claim into a checklist; finds web sources for each claim through perplexity’s remote mcp server; finds research for scientific claims through the consensus mcp server. Work step by step, show me each draft or proposed change, and wait for my approval before anything is sent, published, signed, filed or changed in a live system.

Assembled from this page’s goal and steps. Paste it into your AI platform and adjust it to your situation.

Tools in this workflow

Which AI platforms can run it

PlatformStatusWhy
Claude (incl. Claude Code) To verify Perplexity: pairing not named in vendor docs
OpenAI Codex To verify Perplexity: pairing not named in vendor docs
Google Antigravity To verify Perplexity: pairing not named in vendor docs; Consensus: pairing not named in vendor docs
ChatGPT To verify Perplexity: pairing not named in vendor docs
Gemini To verify Perplexity: pairing not named in vendor docs
Perplexity To verify Perplexity: pairing not named in vendor docs; Consensus: pairing not named in vendor docs; Wolfram: pairing not named in vendor docs

Computed from the MCP and API steps only: "Confirmed" needs the tool's docs to name the platform and the platform to support the connection. Browser, upload and human steps work from any platform.

What we checked (2026-10-17)

  • Perplexity MCP bills usage to a Perplexity API organization that you choose when you sign in. You need to be an admin of an organization that can pay. That’s separate from a Pro or Max subscription.
  • Consensus MCP searches more than 400 million scholarly articles. The $0 plan includes no API or MCP uses, and Pro ($12 a month billed annually) includes 500 a month.
  • Wolfram Cloud MCP is free and needs no sign-in.

Set it up

  1. Ask Claude to list every factual claim in the draft as a numbered checklist: numbers, dates, names, quotes and cause-and-effect statements.
  2. Send web claims to Perplexity and research claims to Consensus, and recompute every figure with Wolfram.
  3. For each claim, record a source link and whether it’s confirmed, partly confirmed or not found.
  4. Open the sources for anything important. A search summary isn’t the source.
  5. Cut unconfirmed claims or label them clearly, then approve the draft.

Sources

Related workflows

No affiliate links on this page. No paid placements in workflows. How IonBin makes money.